Covidien Nellcor SpO2 Forehead Sensor Item Code: RS10; The Covidien Nellcor¿ Forehead SpO2Sensor, model RS10, is indicated for use when continuous non-invasive arterial oxygen saturation and pulse rate monitoring are required for patients weighing more than 40 kg.
Class I - DangerousWhat Should You Do?
- Check if you have this product: Lot Numbers: 161510095H, 161620089H, 161690203H, 161760132H, 161900091H,161970090H, 162040107H, 162110103H, 162320191H, 162390212H
- Do not eat it: Even if it looks and smells fine, do not consume this product.
- Throw it away or return it: You can return the product to the store for a full refund.
- Seek medical attention if needed: If you've consumed this product and feel unwell, contact your doctor immediately.
- Report problems: Report any issues to the FDA's Safety Reporting Portal.
⚠️ Emergency: If you experience severe symptoms after consuming this product, call 911 or Poison Control at 1-800-222-1222.
Recall Details
- Company:
- Covidien LLC
- Reason for Recall:
- Labeling error: The label indicates the product is latex free, but the headband component included with the forehead sensor does contain latex.
- Classification:
- Class I - Dangerous
Dangerous or defective products that predictably could cause serious health problems or death.
- Status:
- terminated
Product Information
Full Description:
Covidien Nellcor SpO2 Forehead Sensor Item Code: RS10; The Covidien Nellcor¿ Forehead SpO2Sensor, model RS10, is indicated for use when continuous non-invasive arterial oxygen saturation and pulse rate monitoring are required for patients weighing more than 40 kg.
Product Codes/Lot Numbers:
Lot Numbers: 161510095H, 161620089H, 161690203H, 161760132H, 161900091H,161970090H, 162040107H, 162110103H, 162320191H, 162390212H
Official Source
Always verify recall information with the official FDA source:
View on FDA.govFDA Recall Number: Z-1125-2017
Related Recalls
Temperature probe devices lack FDA clearance.
Due to customer complaint regarding incorrect display box labeling.
Due to complaints and investigations stating that alarms from the primary patient bedside monitor was not alarming/being transmitted and received on the remote patient monitoring system.