All Recalls

cGMP deviations: uncertainty of the adequacy of the validation of the test methods used to manufacture the products.

CGMP Deviations: Products were manufactured with contaminated excipient that was recalled from the excipient supplier.

CGMP Deviations: Products were manufactured with contaminated excipient that was recalled from the excipient supplier.

cGMP deviations

There is a potential to leak from the catheter where it connects to the drain bag

There is a potential to leak from the catheter where it connects to the drain bag

May shed contaminant particles into the urine specimen that may be misidentified as Red Blood Cells when used in conjunction with the Sysmex UF-1000i or UX-2000 Analyzers and lead to false elevations in RBC counts

Tile kits that allow one to install and situate a video camera within a patient environment are not fitting properly in some domestic institution ceiling tile grids that have a thinner style grid frame. The ceiling tile may suddenly fall from the ceiling and cause a safety risk to the patient or end user.

Due to Label/Pouch mix-up. Pouches incorrectly labeled. Incorrect shelf carton label or pouch label due to inadequate manufacturing line clearance. As a result of this labeling mix-up, there is the possibility of inadvertently selecting the incorrect coil size for the procedure potentially causing some harms like vessel damage, an inability to treat with said device and potential rupture of the aneurysm.

Stent Graft Systems built with specific batches of taper tip assemblies have the potential for the taper tip to detach from the delivery system. Detachment of the taper tip during the implant procedure may lead to a secondary intervention to attempt to remove the taper tip, either by endovascular retrieval or surgical conversion. There is also potential that the taper tip is intentionally left behind in the patient, at the physician's discretion, if not easily removable.

The products in scope underwent an incorrect rework operation for the porous plasma sprayed coating. Internal testing indicated that the parts may not have sufficient adhesion strength. The scope was identified to be all lots that were porous plasma coated or recoated at a vendor that were then reworked through the internal waterjet rework process. The waterjet rework process for porous plasma coating is not validated for products that were coated at a vendor.

The products in scope underwent an incorrect rework operation for the porous plasma sprayed coating. Internal testing indicated that the parts may not have sufficient adhesion strength. The scope was identified to be all lots that were porous plasma coated or recoated at a vendor that were then reworked through the internal waterjet rework process. The waterjet rework process for porous plasma coating is not validated for products that were coated at a vendor.

The products in scope underwent an incorrect rework operation for the porous plasma sprayed coating. Internal testing indicated that the parts may not have sufficient adhesion strength. The scope was identified to be all lots that were porous plasma coated or recoated at a vendor that were then reworked through the internal waterjet rework process. The waterjet rework process for porous plasma coating is not validated for products that were coated at a vendor.

The products in scope underwent an incorrect rework operation for the porous plasma sprayed coating. Internal testing indicated that the parts may not have sufficient adhesion strength. The scope was identified to be all lots that were porous plasma coated or recoated at a vendor that were then reworked through the internal waterjet rework process. The waterjet rework process for porous plasma coating is not validated for products that were coated at a vendor.

Due to 16 complaints related to drivers not engaging in implants. According to the firm's investigations, the incorrect offset gauge was potentially used during production of the implants. As a result, this could potentially lead to aborted or a delay in surgical procedure.

Outer packaging (outer pouch) is not sealed compromising sterility and result in potential risk of patient infection, which could lead to revision surgery

The products in scope underwent an incorrect rework operation for the porous plasma sprayed coating. Internal testing indicated that the parts may not have sufficient adhesion strength. The scope was identified to be all lots that were porous plasma coated or recoated at a vendor that were then reworked through the internal waterjet rework process. The waterjet rework process for porous plasma coating is not validated for products that were coated at a vendor.

The products in scope underwent an incorrect rework operation for the porous plasma sprayed coating. Internal testing indicated that the parts may not have sufficient adhesion strength. The scope was identified to be all lots that were porous plasma coated or recoated at a vendor that were then reworked through the internal waterjet rework process. The waterjet rework process for porous plasma coating is not validated for products that were coated at a vendor.

Mislabeling; dual-bladder tourniquet cuffs are labeled as single-bladder inflatable cuffs.

The product was incorrectly shipped at room temperature rather than refrigerated.